As
things have happened, I think I may have been one of the first people
to see Meant To Be. A few years ago, while attending a certain
writer's conference, there was a screening for the film one evening,
and if I remember it right, it was before it was released to discs.
Summary
Nathan
Burr is a young man who's an aspiring writer, and who's lost his job
and his girlfriend. He's a foster child, and so with some time on his
hands, he travels to where he thinks he as born, in order to get
information about his birth mother, and maybe even meet her. With a
bit of help, he thinks he's found her, but what happens then badly
unsettles him, and he realizes that the truth about his mother,
himself, and even his own existence is far different, and far more
disturbing, than he'd ever had a clue about.
The
story is actually fairly intricate, as it involves not just Nathan
and his mother, but also a high school girl named Tori, who's found
herself in a bad situation, one that relates to Nathan's mother, a
social worker who is trying to help Tori, and to Nathan himself.
The
Mostly Good Part
I
have to give this movie a good amount of credit for both having a
good story idea, and for executing it fairly well. If nothing else,
if someone ever asks you for a “Christian ghost story”, you can
point them to this movie, and the fact that can use a “Christian
ghost story” in the cause of a pro-life message is all the better.
I suppose it could be considered “heavy-handed” or “preachy”,
but I'm fine with that.
But
there are some things in the story that the nitpicky part of me has
some trouble with.
How,
for example, did Nathan “live” for something like 20 years, and
not realize the strange things happening around him, such as the
people not noticing him? How did he get his prominently featured
laptop? How are he and the girl he's met are able to travel around a
city in her car, and not realize that the other drivers are not just
not seeing them, but apparently also driving right through them,
since of course they aren't really there, they don't really exist,
they've been dead since before they were even born? How did he even
have a job and a girlfriend to lose? Who were these foster parents
who raised him, and how did he even end up a foster care system? The
in-story notion that he only interacts with people who suffered the
same fate he did may answer a few of these concerns, but also falls
apart really quick, too.
But
there are other, more serious issues, too.
Nathan
wants to be a writer, and a few times, Nathan acts like a kind of
narrator for parts of the story, as if he were himself telling the
story. In a couple of those times, he claims that he's heard “a
still small voice inside of me” that tells him to “write what he
doesn't know”. To try to be nice about my opinion of this phrase, I
can only consider it an inspiration fail, a bit of nonsense trying to
pose as profound.
When
Mave explains to Nathan the significance of the room with all the
photos, the room of perfect plans (it wasn't capitalized in the
subtitles), we are left with the idea that all the people in the
photos, people whose lives had been ended by abortion, would have had
nice, ideal lives. I find that hard to accept. I find it hard, even
impossible, to believe that among those people would not be liars,
murderers, thieves, people who would break marriage vows, cult
members, drug addicts and drug pushers. In other words,
humans—fallen, sinful, enemies of God who need to repent and
believe in Christ and his sacrificial death for their sins.
Abortion
is murder, it is evil. We do not need to create idyllic futures for
victims of abortion in order to say that it is wrong, and when we do
those types of things, it comes off more like a case based on fantasy
rather than one based on morality.
Christian
Stories
What
is it that makes a movie or a book a Christian story? Is it having a
message based around biblical morality? Is it having an angelic
character? Is it quoting the Bible, or referring to things said in
the Bible? Is it talking about God a lot?
On
the one hand, I'm reluctant to say that a Christian story needs
certain elements in it to be considered a Christian story. If I were
to say “A Christian story needs X in it, or else!”, I've little
doubt there could be several examples given of Christian stories that
don't have X.
On
the other hand, I've read and seen some stories that have been
labeled as Christian that have had some questionable stuff in them,
or seem to get wishy-washy when it comes to certain biblical matters.
When
it comes to trying to evaluate the Christian message of Meant To Be,
I'd like to start with this statement:
In the 1950s, Yale’s H. Richard Niebuhr described the so-called “gospel” of Protestant liberalism poignantly: “A God without wrath brought men without sin into a kingdom without judgment through the ministrations of a Christ without a cross.” Each clause is telling. First, more like Mr. Rogers than the judge of all the earth, the sentimental deity of many Americans is incapable of wrath. Since he exists for us and our happiness, this heavenly friend may be disappointed and sad when we hurt ourselves, but he never sees sin as an offence primarily against himself and his perfect justice. Second, we may make mistakes—pretty bad ones, from time to time—but it would be wrong to call ourselves sinners, much less to imagine that we were captive to sin, helpless to do anything to will or work our way out of the mess. So, third, God brings us basically good people into a kingdom without judgment, since there is no law that could condemn and no gospel that could justify. And finally, for this sort of religious therapy you don’t need a vicarious, atoning sacrifice if you are basically a nice person; what you really need is a good example.
Horton, Michael. The Gospel-Driven Life: Being Good News People in a Bad News World (p. 38). Baker Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.
It
should be noted that God's forgiveness is mentioned a couple of times
in this movie, but the main thing the characters think they are
looking for, what Linda's husband tells her she needs to do and what
Linda tells Tori she will not easily or quickly be able to do if she
gets the abortion, is to forgive themselves.
When
Mave tells Nathan about why his mother aborted him, she says that his
mother “made a mistake”. She tells him that God has a purpose for
our lives, “but sometimes we deviate from that because each of us
has choice”. What do we gain by calling sin simply a mistake?
Rather, what have we lost by downplaying the serious of our actions?
If we make mistakes instead of commit sins, then how seriously bad
are we?
Because
notably absent from this movie is any mention of Jesus and the
gospel. God's forgiveness is mentioned, yes, but it is shunted aside
very quickly, as if it's something that has no bearing on the Linda's
continued guilty feelings or Tori's desire to kill her unborn child
because to continue carrying the child would ruin her plans. But this
cheapens the most important issue of all—that we have sinned
against God, and God would be right to judge us for that, but God has
made a way for us to be made clean from that sin, His only Son Jesus
died so that real-life people can be forgiven for real-life sins. If
we cannot, if even Christians cannot, acknowledge our universal
disease, if we cannot face the truth about ourselves as individuals
and as humanity as a whole, then how can we hope to offer the real
cure to this disease? Instead of the good news that the disease has a
cure, all we would have, all this movie has, is good advice that
offers, and fails, to keep the symptoms at bay.
This
is the most frustrating part about this movie. What is a good story
about the value of life could have been so much better if it had been
as strong with the message of the gospel as it was with its pro-life
message.
Conclusion
It
saddens me that I cannot give this movie more than a rather
half-hearted recommendation, but that really is all I can give it,
because that is all it deserves. It's not a complete waste, but it
simply drops the ball on the most important issues.
